Posts Tagged ‘Leviim’

At the conclusion of the ‘incense-pan test’ during which a fire descended from heaven consuming the 250 rebels and substantiating Aharon’s Divinely chosen role, God commands Moshe to tell Elaazar, Aharon’s son, to collect the ‘discarded’ copper pans, bang them into plate and add them to ‘the mizbeach’ as a sign for Bnei Yisrael that all non-Kohanim are prohibited from bringing incense.

The question is: which mizbeach was Elaazar to revamp? If God was referring to the mizbeach hazahav, it would be very difficult to accept that His very particular design concerning this completely gold and wood altar should now be amended to include copper! Additionally, if the message of these beaten pans was directed to Bnei Yisrael, how would this mizbeach, which most of the nation almost never came in contact with (it was placed in the Kodesh, beyond the regular view of the people), be a satisfactory lesson-conveying signpost? But if God was referring to the mizbeach ha’nechoshet, while the metal would match and it would certainly stand directly in the sight of the intended ‘students’, the lesson it was to convey about not bringing incense would be lost having been taught through the very mizbeach upon which only animals were brought – the mizbeach hazahav was the incense altar!

The entire goal of the incense-pan test was to Divinely reject the 250 Leviim “agents’” claims for equality; and with the death of the entire rebellious group by heavenly fire, the test amply showed that Aharon was chosen by God and this appointment could not be challenged. However, God then tells Moshe to command Elaazar, Aharon’s son, to collect the pans, expressing another integral facet to Aharon’s unimpeachable position: even his children are Divinely-directed players in God’s service. This added message is understood as follows: not only were the specific 250 Leviim “agents” incorrect in their assumption that they were equal to Aharon, but Elaazar’s collection of the pans demonstrates that even the entire Levi tribe (the ‘extension’ of the 250 Leviim) now sojourning in the desert will never achieve the elevated status of Aharon’s family (the ‘extension’ of Aharon, the individual)!

And now back to our original question. To which mizbeach were Elaazar’s renovations directed? It was, in fact, the mizbeach ha’nechoshet so that the lesson could be amply learned and relearned for generations to come by the Yisraelim who brought their korbanot; however, the specific message the added copper taught concerned the incense and its unique service in the mishkan/mikdash as the special privilege of only the Kohanim! By ‘joining’ the Kohanim-incense with the Yisrael-mizbeach, God in essence totally removed the Leviim from the picture, adding yet another pointed lesson to His lecture: not only were the specific 250 Leviim thoughts of equality mistaken, and not only was the present tribe of Levi never to reach Aharon’s family’s level, but even the future generations of Leviim will be absent from the day-to-day services performed in the Temple (i.e. korbanot, incense, cleaning and lighting the menorah, and placing and replacing the bread) – these were not included in the privileged charge God bestowed upon them and never will be!

And finally, in what context did this rebellion occur? After the Leviim were given special, elevated status over the entire nation as guardians of the mishkan, suddenly these 250 wanted even more for themselves, looking to redefine the extent of their responsibility in this framework to an even greater, more active role! This is the very same mistaken approach addressed by the ‘wood collector’ episode and the mitzva of tzitzit found in last week’s parsha – the erroneous desire to redefine God’s commands by following the individual’s perspective of what he believes is ultimately correct. No one, not even the privileged Leviim, is beyond the dangerous grasp of this misguided yearning for the personally defined ‘Right’.

  • Share/Bookmark
More
Last Updated on Thursday, 18 June 2009 03:31

This week’s parsha describes the first stage in counting the entire nation, as commanded to Moshe and Aharon in Ki Tisa, with its ultimate completion in next week’s parsha with the counting of the Leviim. Three questions: 1) Why is the nation counted now? 2) Why are the Leviim left out of this initial census? 3) As prescribed in Ki Tisa, each person counted needed to donate a half-shekel to the mishkan as a ‘ransom for his life so as to avoid bringing upon himself a ‘plague’ [death]’ – why would a shekel-less counting constitute a death sentence?

We must first understand the context of this counting event: after Har Sinai, the tragedy with the golden calf and the completion of the mishkan, and immediately before the nation is ‘scheduled’ to travel into Eretz Yisrael (see Rashbam and others), God tells Moshe and Aharon that it is time to count all the army-aged men of the nation; the Leviim are excluded from this census – but are to be counted later – and this opening scene closes with the outlining of the rules concerning the formation of nation when it travels (Leviim accompanying the aron in the middle, with the rest of the tribes flanking on all four sides).

Whichever opinion you choose to agree with concerning the chronology of the event of the golden calf (i.e. before or after the mishkan), at this point in time both have occurred and therefore there are two ‘facts’ that the nation must contend with: a) after the erroneous sin, God told Moshe that He would send a messenger with the nation when they enter Eretz Yisrael, for He, Himself, will not be accompanying this infuriatingly stubborn nation (for their own good) (Shemot 33; 3), and b) a structure has been erected which, for all intents and purposes, relegates God’s presence to a specific location vis-à-vis the nation. The similarity between both these new realities is that God has in essence removed Himself from any overarching presence amongst the people themselves (although certainly still dwelling within the ‘camp’).

And now they must be counted. In this week’s haftarah, Hoshea tells Bnei Yisrael that, “and the numbers of Bnei Yisrael will be like the sand of the sea, which cannot be measured or counted; and instead of [God] saying to them, ‘you are not My nation’, He will say to them, ‘[you are] sons of a living God’!” It would seem from this declaration that not being countable leads the people to a heightened Divine relationship while being numbered and measured renders the nation “not God’s”. This, along with the two realities mentioned above, expresses the true nature of this census: God is illustrating through His command to count the nation that they are now ‘on their own’, and that the enumerated soldiers will form an army to conquer their promised Land founded strictly upon their own leadership and military might . And this explains why a ‘ransoming’ half-shekel for the mishkan was required from every counted person, because through the counting they are being removed from a personally involved God presence, separated from His Divine connection and in order to counter the (enforced) forsaking of God (a ‘deadly’ sin) they were required to contribute to, and therein maintain and affirm, a connection to the symbol which represented the ‘separated’, yet ever-present Godly existence in their midst – the mishkan.

And why, immediately after this ‘transformation’, is the nation told that they will march surrounding the aron? Because it serves as a perfect illustration of their newly established relationship with God: while He must be found at their ‘center’, God will nonetheless remain distinct from them, screened by the encircling Leviim, the very tribe who will need their own, distinct census because theirs is for the exact opposite reason than that of the nation’s! Their counting will serve to incorporate them into God’s ‘army’ – ‘all who will come to serve in the army of performing the services of the ohel moed’’ (4; 23) – elevating them to an even higher level of Divine connection. And why does God state that the Leviim must divide the nation from the mishkan in the center, ‘so that there will not be an anger (‘ketzef’) on the nation (‘eidah’) of Israel’ – and the only other time this combination of ‘ketzef’ and ‘eidah’ is used is in Yehoshua

  • Share/Bookmark
More
Last Updated on Thursday, 21 May 2009 03:29